Comprehensive Modding Guide for 2010

Introduction and Disclaimer

This is a guide intended to help first-time moderators make their modding experience as successful as possible.
Because there's a lot to cover, the guide has been split into a number of small sections for your convenience.

This guide is primarily intended for use on mafiascum.net. However, I have tried to generalize everything so that the contents should apply to other sites, or at least tell you what parts you can skip.

Note that my name is not on the title of this guide because I like attention, so much as to warn you ahead of time that my well-established blunt fascism pervades the advice you're going to read. You may not agree with some of the tips in this guide, and that's fine - as long as you understand why I said them and you can defend your alternative opinion.

There is a small subset of mods who are adept at selectively breaking the rules laid out in this guide in some of their games. We affectionately call them "bastard mods". While some of them are very successful and create enjoyable and innovative games, just as many of them fail spectacularly - often to the extent that they don't consider trying to mod another game for their own sakes.
Mods that think that the rules in this guide do not apply to them regardless, on the other hand, are simply referred to as "bad". If you are one of these people, this IS me making a patronizing judgment against you - your modding practices are bad and you should feel bad.

Are you ready? Let's work some magic. First-time mods should definitely read Chapters I and IV; experienced mods are encouraged to read the rest of it.

I. Setup Design and Preparation

• mafiascum.note: This entire chapter does not apply to Open games.

Setup creation is one of the most gratifying parts of moderation - you can design a setup exactly how you want it, with all the individuality you want to add!
Because of this, I'm not going to spend much time talking about what you SHOULD put in your setup. That's up to you. I will, however, go over common pitfalls that will cause people to hate your pet game design.

I.A Getting an Idea

An interesting setup starts with a core concept. This can be a theme, a new set of mechanics, the interplay between some roles, an entirely new role, exploiting the power of a familiar role, or even just wanting an "ordinary" game with none of that stuff I just mentioned.
If you can't think of any concept that you like, don't force yourself into choosing one - a good idea for a setup will come eventually. What's important is that you like the setup you're designing and have thought it through carefully. If you reach the top of the mod queue and don't have any ideas, do everyone a favor and /out to mod. Playing and modding Mafia games are long-term commitments that shouldn't just be thrown around.

• If you are opting for an "ordinary" game, you can move on to the next section now.

If you are trying to be creative with your setup idea - especially in the realm of game mechanics - make sure you know how it can be applied to Mafia. Not all of your cool mechanics-based ideas can translate smoothly into Mafia games, or even at all. Think of how your mechanic would affect gameplay - can it be abused? to the point where it can break the game? Has this idea been done before, and if so, how did it go? Would it be a good idea to make roles that could take advantage of the new mechanics? Explore how much the mechanic will affect gameplay, and how heavily it will factor into the game. And most importantly of all, do it in the Theme queue (see I.B).

From here you can build your setup around your concept. You can do that on your own, although I'll help you out in I.C. If you're playing on mafiascum.net, you'll need to make it fit into the site's constraints, which you can read about in the next section. When you're done designing the setup and you've looked it over for balance a few times, move to I.D.

I.B Normal vs. Themed, Mini vs. Large

• mafiascum.note: This section only applies to games on mafiascum.net.

I type on the subject of what constitutes a "Normal" setup at some personal risk. Raising the topic is asking for a firestorm of controversy.
Understand that the loose definition of "Normal" involves a setup that is not deviant from a basic game of Mafia. As for what a basic game of Mafia looks like and how far one can deviate from it... everyone has their own ideas, and while there are vague guidelines with plastic enforcement, any setup that isn't terribly basic is virtually guaranteed to make someone upset.

As a general rule, if there can be any doubt that your game is not Normal, don't run it as a Normal. It's that simple.

Note that "Normal" does not connote "boring". Your setup, especially your first setup, does not have to be legendary and/or awesome (although that would be a plus; but there are still ways to make the game interesting - inviting a good player list, for instance, will accomplish the same effect (see Chapter III). After all, a more complex game means a higher chance of messing something up - and a higher chance that the screwup will be as legendary as the setup you're trying to run.

If you still wish to show some unique flair in a Normal game, there are still several of good options available within the limits. You are allowed to have one unique role in your setup as long as it's not too far removed from the other Normal roles, and altering an existing role somewhat is a good way to put one together. In this game, the unique role was a role that Trackers would always read as having targeted someone who died that Night. Alternatively, you can try breaking a relatively benign meta. The players in this game got a surprise when someone claimed Jailer and was then counterclaimed... and both of them were Town and what they said they were. I'm sure you can come up with some more ideas, but the general idea is that it's entirely possible to run Normal games that are interesting as long as you have a sense for where the limits are and don't get too close to them.

The other constraint on your game is size. Minis are for 12 players or fewer; Large games include everything else. Ignoring the obvious factor that you can't run Large games in the Mini queue, you should consider that it's more difficult to fill Large games. If you really want to run a 30-player game, you're going to need to do a tremendous job of advertising to come close to filling it. There are a limited number of talented and available people onsite at any given time; the larger the game, the smaller the proportion they can possibly make up in your game given that you recruit them. The rest of the game will likely be filled with untested unknowns who have a nasty habit of flaking or lowering the level of play in ways that are fascinating to read when they happen in other peoples' games. In addition, it is notoriously difficult for majority votes to materialize in the early Days in Large games, making them very painful at start. As a general rule, unless your setup unavoidably requires more players I would try to keep your game's size at around 17, maximum. If your game is any larger, I would strongly advise you to incorporate a means of killing at least four people during each Day/Night cycle.

I.C Great Setup Guidelines

Yes, yes, I know I said I wouldn't speak for too long about what you SHOULD put into a setup, but these tips should help any game you run.

Regardless of whether setup is Normal or Themed, it should not be more complex than it has to be. Decreased complexity lightens the workload for everyone, and more importantly does not necessarily take anything away from the setup. If you have lots of ideas, spread them among multiple setups. Putting them all in one setup decreases the value of each of them while increasing the number of checks you have to make to ensure that they work as you want them to, and makes you work harder to put together future games besides.

Each of your Role PMs should come with a Win Condition and precise descriptions of what each ability does. That sounds wordier than it is in practice. If you just say

"You're a Town Doctor"

there are a number of questions you'll have to answer - what do you have to do to win? Can you protect anyone, even yourself? Can you protect against daykills? Are you guaranteed that protecting is ALL you do? Do they stop multiple kills on the same Night? These are all questions that you'll have to answer eventually; you may as well spell them out in the Role PM--

"You're a Town Doctor; at Night you can protect a living player to prevent one kill that targets them that Night; you win when all the non-Town are dead; confirm in-thread".

I.D Getting a Reviewer or Back-Up Mod

This is not optional, regardless of your setup. Your idea of a balanced setup does not necessarily match someone else's, and you can get some good ideas by pitching the idea to someone else.

If a similar game has been done before, find the moderator of that game and ask them to review yours. If you're not so lucky, find your favorite experienced moderator and ask them to look your game over. Posting in a review request thread does not guarantee your request will be picked up; you should be proactive in seeking a reviewer. Incidentally, it's considered common courtesy to tell your reviewer ahead of time if your setup is unusually complex.

During the peer review process, make sure you ask if the central idea behind the setup will work and if any similar games have been run to their knowledge. Having a sample game to work from takes a lot of the guesswork out of balance tweaks.

Your reviewer may ask or tell you to make some changes, and why. While you may see it as a boorish infringement on your glorious idea (to which you have probably become attached by this point) you should generally accept their criticism and make the changes. If your reviewer tells you to start over, consider a second opinion... but again, you wouldn't be told this without good reason.

It would be ideal to get more than one reviewer for your setup if it's anything more than basic. Different people bring different levels of expertise along with their different opinions. You don't want to start the game, have an issue come up, and facepalm in unison with your single reviewer.

Getting a back-up moderator is not as easy because it requires a lengthy time commitment where the backup is anchored to the site and may have to pick up your game at any time. Generally speaking, your backup should be one of your reviewers; and it will likely be one of your reviewers that actually likes the setup. Or they could do it because they like you - by the time you reach the top of the mod queue, you should have SOME e-friends, right?

I can do some reviewing right here. Go on to the next section.

I.E Vi's Review Checklist!

• Is there any way, no matter how unlikely, that this game can be "broken" (i.e. made so that one faction cannot win even with optimal play)?
• Is there any way, no matter how unlikely, that this game can go to a Kingmaker scenario (i.e. made so that one player is guaranteed to lose but chooses the winner)?
• Is there an alignment Cop? with a Doctor? without a Mafia Roleblocker?
• Is there a Cult? with normal recruitment mechanics? (This is a good way to get people to hate you and your entire family)
• If the game starts with at least 9 players, can the Town lose without mislynching three times?
• Is there a high number of "confirmable" roles? (i.e. a one-shot Vig can be confirmed by shooting; Masons can confirm each other; etc.)
• Are there "mod notes" or other facets of the setup that are completely unknown to every player?
• Are there any unclarified role interactions where the results could become fuzzy? (Bus Drivers, mutual Roleblockers, and multiple kill flavors are the usual suspects)
• Are there any abilities that can be abused? (i.e. Inventors that can ask for anything they like; Town falseclaim abilities)
• Are more than half of the players power roles?
• Are any of your players given debilitating post restrictions?
• If you were playing in a similar game and received any of the roles from this setup, would you be upset with that game's moderator?

If the answer to any of these questions is "yes", your setup needs a second look - at least.

So once you've gotten your game sufficiently reviewed, it's time to move on to the next chapter.

II. Setup Design for Theme Games

• This section is intended only for games with flavor themes, obviously. If you aren't using one, you get to skip this whole chapter!

Everyone has a favorite non-Mafia passion, be it a video game or a TV show or a book or a time period. So it stands to reason that you'll want to merge that into a Mafia game, right?

It's not quite as easy as that, unfortunately. There are a few hurdles you'll have to clear.

II.A Massclaim

First and foremost, you will be faced with the prospect of a massclaim. Themes where the goodies and the baddies are obvious and unambiguous are extremely dangerous to work with. If you try to include all of the main characters in the setup, everyone can simply claim their role and lynch whoever claims an antagonist or an extremely minor (safe) character. Death Note and Chrono Trigger are examples of popular themes that are easily subsceptible to massclaims simply because there aren't many good-side characters to go around. Similarly, games where there are an abundance of power roles are well-suited for massclaim, as the Town can reduce the game to a logic puzzle if it succeeds.

One of the two most popular precautions taken against massclaims is to arrange a "parallel universe" game where alignments are not guaranteed to be as they are in canon. The upside to this is that you can include any characters you like; the downside is that players that have knowledge of the theme but do not know that alignments are no longer the same as usual are actually punished and deceived for knowing the flavor in a game that they likely joined BECAUSE of the flavor.
The other preferred precaution is to deliberately leave out main characters and use them as falseclaims for the scum groups. Here you can preserve the canon alignments at the expense of not having the whole cast in the game. Here is a game that demonstrates both of these. Eleven of the twelve roles were arbitrary characters from the source flavor, and two of them were randomly chosen to be Mafia; this is Precaution 1. In this post, Cobalt claims the main character and expects to become automatically confirmed Town for it; in a game that utilizes Precaution 2 well, this is an appeal to mod-side WIFOM and should have the potential to be a dangerous scum tactic.

Note that post restrictions, preventing people from talking about their Role PM, or otherwise making it against the rules to attempt a massclaim are terrible ideas that should not be attempted. This is essentially pushing the mod-side problem of making a setup that can be broken onto the players, and is terrible practice; you will be an intrinsically worse person for doing this and should be subject to ridicule. The reason behind this is that the Townies will get very frustrated when they learn that the tactic they can use to solve the game through flavor analysis or Night actions (which ordinarily they can do) is specifically unavailable to them, and clever Townies will find ways around whatever arbitrary post restrictions you set. An interesting subversion in making massclaiming a player-side problem is including a player-side solution. In two of the extremely role-heavy Mind Screw games by Tarhalindur, a non-Town player was given an ability that enabled them to kill players that had revealed any of their ability titles inthread. In the case of the linked game, the "Punisher" role went on to win the game.

II.B Falseclaims

This is a tangential subject to massclaims. If a role's alignment is as expected in canon - regardless of whether you are applying the precautions from the previous minisection - your scum players will need falseclaims.

The first rule of a falseclaim is that it has to be believable. I have already touched on scum getting easily caught after claiming characters so minor that they are unlikely to be in the game when all the main characters are present. Precaution 2 from the massclaim section is the conscious and deliberately planned way to deal with this; you can do the same thing to a lesser extent in any game provided you ensure that the falseclaims you give the scum are not as obscure as a significant number of the actual Town roles.

The second rule of a falseclaim is that it has to fit the abilities the original role has. Safeclaims that don't fit the roles the scum are likely to claim are useless. Ideally, a scum player should be able to fullclaim each of its nonfactional abilities with different flavor names and be able to pass a spot check for flavor. This requires you to think about which Town roles would have equivalent abilities to your scum roles, and match them together in falseclaims.

Scum roles that are protagonists in-flavor do not necessarily need falseclaims. Town roles generally do not need falseclaims regardless of their canon alignment; however, this could lead to a meta where deliberately claiming "scum" roles would be a Town-tell. Feel free to mix this up.

A small minority of moderators write falseclaims for their players upon request. If you give this ability to a Town player, be prepared for one to ask for a non-Town Role PM. Be prepared to blindside them.

II.C Flavor Knowledge

Believe it or not, there are people who haven't heard of your pet flavor before. How accessible do you want this game to be to people who have no idea what the background for your flavor is?

Obviously, you can make a more immersive and interesting game by heavily applying flavor. For instance, in the Radiant Dawn game I linked to a while ago I could have gone the other way with the flavor and given each player an ability based on their ingame Skills (so Shinon would have received Deadeye, Tanith would have wielded Stun, etc.). Given that we're coming out of the massclaim minisection, I think you can see the problems that are starting to creep in. First, the character-specific abilities would be confirmable - and therefore cannot be faked or falseclaimed out of. In addition, an amateur scum player would not know this and would be very likely to commit a gaffe when trying to falseclaim. And of course the flavor discussion would heat up to the point where people who try to play your game that DON'T know the flavor will become more annoyed than anything. Thus, the game becomes exclusive to people who have experienced your flavor - and depending on what that flavor is, that will cause the pool of people who are able to functionally play the game to dwindle. (In the case of the Radiant Dawn game, only three of the players had any experience with the source game.)

The other direction is to make it so that players don't need to know the flavor at all to fully enjoy the game. The upside to this is that it serves as a more casual introduction to the source flavor for people who have not encountered it before, and also keeps the pool of potential players open. The downside is the same as it was in Precaution 1 two minisections ago - flavor knowledge actually becomes a liability. Consider what you would do if someone claimed a flavor name they didn't know but you recognize as a flavor antagonist. What would you do? What would you do if you had previously been told that you didn't need to know the flavor to get full enjoyment out of the game?

I think you can see by now why Themes are more difficult to run well than standard games, and why mafiascum.net doesn't allow first-time mods to run them. With that said, the freedom the Theme banner gives you is enormous and I highly suggest you learn the ins and outs of what to do with the potential. As it stands, we're definitely ready to move out of the setup design chapter now.

III. The Queue

• Once again, this chapter is most important to mods on mafiascum.net. On smaller sites, there is only one queue, only one game running at a time, and a very limited number of players to choose from. In that case, while it may be helpful to read through this chapter a lot of the material won't really apply.

As I mentioned earlier, Mafia games are long-term commitments and experienced players generally do not haphazardly join them. So it's YOUR job to get those players to come to you! And to do that, we have to turn to one of the more interesting (yet traditionally more sleazy) parts of any good production - marketing.

III.A Advertising the Game

So you're midway through the long line to mod a game, and you're really excited about what's coming up, right? ...Right? No? Then get out of the mod queue. Aside from begging the question of why you would willingly put yourself through a long-term commitment you don't really want to do, your players will likely be as excited to play the game as you are to mod it - if not immediately, then during the game when your lack of enthusiasm creeps in.

'Still reading? Great! It's your job to get other people excited about your game - excited enough that they pre-emptively join it (pre-in). So, get ready to hype your game as much as you can without being obnoxious. If your setup has a draw to it - a unique theme or mechanic, for instance - definitely get ready to mention it. Make sure your setup has a cool or clever name - people may join based on that alone if you're witty enough. Put a line in your signature telling people that your game is coming up. After you've done these, it's time to really work your charm.

As a general rule, people who would otherwise be ambivalent about joining your game will usually not say no to you if you specifically ask them to join your game via PM. Find some people that you like - or who like you - and send them a simple message detailing that you're going to run a game, what kind of theme or mechanic is in the game (if any), that you would like to see them in your game for [personal reason here], please and thank you. It's important that you don't come on strong or heavy-handed here - you should gear your message toward how your game suits your invitee's interests, not your need to fill a game. Remember: The best advertising doesn't feel like advertising.

Dropping obvious hints that you are running a game that you want to drum up interest in around discussion forums is a somewhat more indirect approach to recruitment. The effectiveness of this tactic depends on how well you play it. If a hot subject comes up on its own in some topic and your game just happens to be geared around that subject - or you decide based on that topic to build your next game around that subject - it's okay to say as much in a single post and answer any subsequent questions about it. If you do this well, you can get people to pre-in that you may not have thought to recruit on your own, as well as score some notoriety for your game that will hopefully make it the kind of game that people will refer to in future discussions~ To contrast, if you spam propaganda about your game to the point of trying to hijack a thread (or creating your own thread about the game), more likely than not the only thing you will do is annoy a lot of people.

The best marketing you can get is your prior modding experience. If you have already modded a game on this site and people liked it, by all means call your former player list back and ask them to play again. If the game attracted outside attention, people will start coming to you asking to join your next game. Games have been known to be filled from pre-ins solely based on the moderator's reputation - without the mod having to do anything except say they're going to run another game.

III.B Filling Your Game

My personal philosophy is that you should have as many pre-ins as possible (well, within obvious limits). The more pre-ins you have, the fewer random bypassers you need to fill in the remaining slots in your game, the less time your game spends in the queue, the sooner your game runs. This seems easy enough to understand, but since there's some opposition to the idea of trawling for pre-ins I'm going to go into a little more detail on the subject.

• The following material is controversial and not all that necessary to go into for first-time mods. You can skip ahead to the next section if you like.

Flakers are the bane of Mafia games. While people can ask to replace out for a number of reasons - extended vacation, computer problems, and hating the guts of the other players come to mind - flakers don't even offer a notice that they've left, leaving their player slot to stagnate for some unacceptable amount of time until someone notices. They then get prodded, and after a few more fruitless hours they are replaced or modkilled. This process ranges from annoying to game-suffocating. So far, we're all in agreement, right?

I contend that the randoms that join your game from the queue are more likely to flake out. (Presumably you didn't invite known flakers or irresponsible players into your game, right?) Therefore, you can minimize the problem by getting as many pre-ins - players that you chose to play the game - as possible. Some of the players that join from the queue are going to be good, and you'll wish you had them, but as a general rule you want to minimize risk.

Another facet of controlling who plays your game is that you can determine the overall skill level of the game. While trying to put all of the all-star players into a single game may be pushing the envelope a bit, drawing from up-and-coming talent tends to work fairly well, as they are less likely to be choosy about what kind of setup they play. By looking into your list of pre-ins you can avoid some of the common tropes that make games less than fun - two extreme Type A personalities that can drench a thread in pages of spiteful flamefests that don't actually go anywhere, or a small subset of the player list that isn't as skilled as the rest of the game and weighs it down, etc. Now consider that the queue throws a random factor into what kind of players you get to fill in the spots you don't have pre-ins for.

Generally speaking, you don't want to have a small group of players that is obviously outclassed by the rest.

III.C How to Refuse Players

You have the right to refuse to let people play your game for any reason. It should go without saying that while you're trying to recruit people to play your games, the flip side is that you don't want some players to join. Rejection is not easy to do - these are people who want to play your game, after all - so here are some common-sense tips for how to do so effectively.

When some mods have a setup they really want to run at full potential, they set experience requirements for joining, like needing to have completed at least two games. This is the easiest and safest way to safeguard your setup, as there's little negotiation to be done with that kind of restriction and it pretty clearly hints that your setup is not for beginners. However, I would highly suggest you not try this with your first game - the number of games you require your players to have played before joining your game should not be more than the number of games you have modded to completion.

There are going to be some specific players you don't want to join your game, though. If you're going to refuse them, you had better have a good reason for why and be prepared to tell a very confused and disconsolate potential player why you don't want them in your game. Unless the reason for denying them is very obvious and non-negotiable, you should be willing and able to enter a conversation via PM in regards to arguing the merits of whether they should be able to join your game in spite of your initial judgment. After all, people do change... sometimes. Many times the player will consider the re-evaluation conversation too much of a hassle, though, and will simply not bother to pursue the issue - and you get your wish.

Incidentally, do not write up a formal blacklist unless you plan on filling it with people you are unequivocally NOT allowing into your games. You are not in elementary school; you do not need to carry a Ledger of Hate around with you to point to and say "oh sorry, you're on The List". If you don't remember why you don't want someone to play your games, their "ban period" has expired.

Barring special circumstances, any player who has flaked out of your games before should not be given a chance to flake out of your games again.

Letting newbies - players who do not have a reputation to research - into your games is a mixed bag. As a general rule, I would ask a few intro questions ("You know how to play and you know games are going to last ____ long, right?") and make a decision based on that. Newbies who really want to play will likely answer the questions at all; you don't have to worry about the ones who don't. Newbies that use proper English get preference.

Am I asking you to judge people? Absolutely!
While it's unfortunate that you may have to turn away people who would otherwise want to play your game, it's more important that your player list will not cause you trouble later (by flaking, etc.). On mafiascum.net, they can join another game as easily. On smaller sites, that's actually not the case, so the player group must decide on its own whether to allow some players in.

IV. Facilitating the Game!

Okay! The game's full and you've been given the green light to start the game! Now to finally realize what you've been wanting to do for quite the while now...

...carefully. It's a lot easier to screw a game up than you would think. That's why this section is very important - now that you have players relying on your moderation, you need to make sure this part of your job goes well.

IV.A Pregame

First, you need to determine who gets what role. Regardless of any promises or cool hypothetical situations you may have made up before now, you need to make the role assignments random. Not doing so will result in mod-side WIFOM - people outguessing your personality to attempt to figure out who you would give your power roles and Mafia cards to. (And if you don't do this, don't tell people as much.)

Next, you need to send your Role PMs out. It's easiest to create one tab for each PM you send, paste one Role PM per tab, fill in the recipients, check them, double-check them, and send them out. You DON'T want someone to receive the wrong role, especially in a game with unique flavor. It's easiest to place the recipient's name somewhere inside the PM for extra security (or if nothing else errors will be reported to you sooner). Make sure you send your Role PMs in the order of your player list - games have been broken because the scum Role PMs were sent at a different time as the Town roles.

When players confirm, they are acknowledging that they have received their Role PM, they understand it all, and are ready to play. Letting players confirm by returning a PM to you or posting inthread is a matter of personal preference. It's usually more neat to make players confirm via PM in Large games. Do not accept merely picking up the PM as confirmation.

As there's a nasty tendency for one or two players to need to be replaced pregame for not confirming, it's best not to wait for every player to confirm before starting the game. Good numbers of confirmed players to wait on before starting the game are 8 out of 9 players, 10 out of 12 players, 12 out of 15 players, etc. These numbers are chosen to make it very likely that at least one scum player is actually playing at the beginning of the game.

IV.B During the Game

Unless you're the type that likes editing snarky side comments into your players' posts(~), the mod's job once the game has started is fairly hands-off. You provide vote counts, prods, replacements, flavor, kill scenes, and answer questions via PM. I'll go into each of these.

IV.B.i Vote Counts

Contrary to popular belief, vote counts are not difficult to do and should come at regular intervals. There are lots of approaches to doing them, as well. I recommend you make a separate post for each vote count you do, as they are easy to spot in isolated searches and generally stick out well. Editing vote counts into posts, even at the tops of pages, makes them difficult to find. Keeping a single vote count in the topic post is an abomination that should not be attempted.

As long as you post vote counts on a regular schedule, you should only have a few posts to skim through for bold text. Find a time each day when you know you can be on the computer, navigate to your previous vote count, and quote your old vote count in a new tab. Now scroll through the posts looking for bold text (it should stick out to you), and everywhere you see a vote change, change your vote count post accordingly. When you reach the end of the posts, just swap over to the vote count tab and submit the post.

Each time you post a vote count that does not include the deadline or how many votes it takes to lynch someone, a puppy comes down with terminal cancer. This is not an option or a nicety; if you don't do it someone WILL complain until you do.

IV.B.ii Prods

Your method of prodding is, well, yours. It's easiest to set a specific length of time (on mafiascum.net, three days works well) and prod anyone who has not posted inthread during that length of time, even if they're on V/LA (they'll need the prod when they come back to the thread~). Some moderators prod only upon request; this is also acceptable. You do not need to announce unrequested prods, although it is generally helpful so you don't get any questions from the players asking what you're doing about someone's inactivity.

IV.B.iii Replacements

Replacements are for people who request it or people who are so inactive that you have to kick them out. My standard for that is five days without posting on mafiascum.net - almost a week. The rate of play onsite is slow, but not that slow. Ideally, you should have someone in mind that could potentially be ready to replace into your game - an e-friend, someone who couldn't sign up for your game quickly enough, etc. If you don't have anyone immediately available to replace in, you're going to need to make a public notice that you need a replacement. All of the advertising from Chapter III comes back here - you need to make your game look more interesting than the ones around it so people will want to join in. You can also let your players try to recruit replacements on their own, although there's a certain factor of trust that goes into that - you don't want your players to recruit people by telling potential replacements their role, for instance.

After making your public notice that you need a replacement, you may find that someone you don't particularly like wants to replace in. Unless someone else also requests to replace in really soon after the fact, take them and deal with it. It's more important that every player slot is filled once the game is underway. This is especially true at Night; if at all possible every player slot should be full when you start a new Day, and you especially cannot have more than one empty slot when Day breaks.

A good rule to have is that if a player wants to voluntarily replace out of a game, they need to find their own replacement.

IV.B.iv Flavor and Mod Commentary

Flavor is just a snappy script that goes along with your vote counts and lynch scenes. It should certainly be fun to read, but as a general rule you should not tell players more than they absolutely need to know. While some sites and mods drop clues to help the Town along (i.e. someone saw the killer go by and caught a flash of blue from its avatar), again, this turns the game into a contest of outguessing the mod. However, it is certainly possible (especially in Theme games) to throw in flavor clues that may help the Town without derailing the game. Kill flavors - where each dead player is listed as killed by a certain method according to who killed them - are an easy way to do this. For instance, Mafia and Vigilantes typically kill with a gun, SKs tend to stab their victims, vampires drain their prey, and zombies/werewolves shred and maul their targets. While you can use this to distinguish which faction killed whom, it doesn't directly implicate a player, so it's okay... although you may not want to make kills distinguishable for balance reasons. It's up to what's best for the game, and when in doubt you should simply not bother with it.

Similarly, official mod commentary through the game should not be revealing. One easy mistake to make deals with time meta: If a player was not online at all during the Night phase, they obviously could not have submitted any actions. Whether it's right or wrong, you should try to avoid this if at all possible. For that reason, I highly recommend that you not cut Nights short because all actions have been submitted.

IV.B.v Kills and Modkills

Kills are pretty easy to do. Check and doublecheck the votes and actions, post that so-and-so died, their role, how they died (Lynched, Killed, or whatever kill flavor you have), and then un/lock the topic.

Modkills, on the other hand, are not so easy to do. Each player counts for game balance, and by modkilling someone, you're heavily influencing the outcome of the game - so don't do it except as a last resort or if rules have clearly been broken. What this means is that you should avoid modkilling for things like inactivity or general misanthropy unless you are absolutely sick of the offending player and cannot find a replacement. On the other hand, modkilling for the integrity of the game - like for deliberately quoting a Role PM or illegally communicating with other players - should be reflexive. You have rules; enforce them. (In borderline cases, though, you should definitely speak with the offending player.)

Modkills on Town generally end the Day. Modkills on scum generally do not.

Whenever you are making an official mod ruling, you should lock the topic and put up a post briefly explaining why the topic is locked. (This can be as simple as "Mod scene forthcoming".)

IV.B.vi Giving away information

As a moderator you will likely be asked questions about the game. If the questions are about clarifications to the rules, those are obviously safe (although if the players are trying to break the game you may not like the answers you have to give). When questions start getting into subjects like confirming roles, you need to err on the side of whatever caution you can take without contradicting any of your earlier policies. Remember, some players will try to bring the mod in to help in breaking the game toward their Win Condition. It is imperative that you not allow yourself to be drawn into a question-and-answer session about the minutae of the rules or game mechanics.

IV.C Postgame

So you've finally made it to the end of the game! There are only a few steps left to make your game complete!

It is expected that you will post the complete setup (each Role PM and who got which role) and all night actions at the end of the game. You won't get any suggestions or much praise about the setup until people know all the details of it. This sounds like an obvious check on your to-do list, but it's surprising how many times it just doesn't happen.

It's okay to let discussion of the game go on after the game is over, and even for you to participate in it as well. Do not be condescending to the players even if they were particularly boneheaded; you're speaking from the viewpoint of someone who has had perfect knowledge of the setup throughout while the entire point of the game was for people to try not to be wrong. You should not lock the topic for the last time until discussion has obviously ceased for a while - cutting off discussion hinders your players from learning from the experience or even establishing friendly relationships with each other.

V. tl;dr

Don't screw up!