You are viewing the MafiaScum.net Wiki. To play the game, visit the forum.
Category talk:Ambiguous Roles: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(I think it's about possible harm from the role) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I was thinking about this too. Maybe someone can check the history (I can't seem to work it >.<) and see when this was edited in, and see if we can find a reason? - Xdaamno | I was thinking about this too. Maybe someone can check the history (I can't seem to work it >.<) and see when this was edited in, and see if we can find a reason? - Xdaamno | ||
:I think it's more in the sense that the Quack can actually harm the town, rather than have a positive effect (ordinary Power Roles) or neutral (Plain Townies). Do we need to rename the category, maybe, or change the description? -- Mr. Flay | :I think it's more in the sense that the Quack can actually harm the town, rather than have a positive effect (ordinary Power Roles) or neutral (Plain Townies). Do we need to rename the category, maybe, or change the description? -- Mr. Flay | ||
Yes, I think 'alignment or win condition' is misleading. Quacks still only win in one way - with the town - Xdaamno | |||
Revision as of 15:38, 12 June 2007
I don't get how a quack has an ambiguous alignment or win condition - Shanba
I was thinking about this too. Maybe someone can check the history (I can't seem to work it >.<) and see when this was edited in, and see if we can find a reason? - Xdaamno
- I think it's more in the sense that the Quack can actually harm the town, rather than have a positive effect (ordinary Power Roles) or neutral (Plain Townies). Do we need to rename the category, maybe, or change the description? -- Mr. Flay
Yes, I think 'alignment or win condition' is misleading. Quacks still only win in one way - with the town - Xdaamno