Allomancer/Nomic 2.0

Immutable Rules

R101: Authority of Rules

All players must always abide by all the rules then in effect. These rules only apply within the realm of the game, which consists of the wiki page and the game thread, as well as anywhere else defined by these rules.

R102: Players

A player is considered active when they post /in in the game thread. A player is considered inactive if they have not posted in a week. An inactive player can be considered active if they post re-/in. Inactive players may discuss in the game thread, but may not submit or vote upon proposals. A player is also considered inactive if they post /out.

R103: Ability to Change Rules

No rule can be made to stop further amendments, additions, deletions or changes to the rules.

R104: Editing and Deleting Posts

No-one may edit or delete any post on the the game thread, with the exception of the initial post, which may be edited to display important information at the discretion of the moderator.

R105: Dominance of Immutable Rules

Immutable rules automatically override mutable rules unless an immutable rule specifies otherwise.

R106: Player Votes

All active players are eligible to vote and have a single vote.

R107: Transmutation of Immutable Rules

All immutable rules may be transmuted to mutable rules by unanimous consent. Immutable rules may not be amended or repealed unless first transmuted to mutable rules.

R108: Transmutation of Mutable Rules

All mutable rules may be transmuted to immutable rules by a supermajority.

R109: Voting Threshold Definitions

Unaminous consent is defined as 100% of the active votes in support. A supermajority is defined as greater than 2/3 of the active votes in support. An absolute majority is defined as greater than 50% of the active votes in support. A plurality is defined as having the most votes in support of it in comparison to the competing options. For the purposes of calculating the number of active votes, tally up the total number of votes possessed by all of the active players in the game.

Mutable Rules

R110: New Rules

All new rules are mutable.

R201: Minimum Number of Active Players

No proposals can be voted upon, enacted, or failed without at least 3 active players.

R202: Naming System

Proposals shall begin numbering at P001 and count up by each ordinal number. When a proposal is made a new rule, the new rules will begin numbering at R301 and count up by each ordinal number.When a proposal amends a rule, -A1 shall be added to end of the rule number. The number will count up by each ordinal number for subsequent amendments. The original text of the rule, prior to any amendments, shall be designated by the suffix -A0.

R203: Definition of Amendment

Amendments can modify the rule they are a part of. When two amendments to the same rule conflict, the higher amendment number takes precedence.

R204: Minimum Number of Votes for Mutable Rules

New rules require an absolute majority to pass, and mutable rules can be amended or repealed by absolute majority.

R205: Resolution of Rule Conflicts

Whenever a mutable law conflicts with a mutable law, or an immutable law conflicts with an immutable law, the lowest ordinal shall take precedence unless otherwise dictated by the laws involved. If both defer to each other, then the number rule applies again.

R206: Acceptable Voting Methods

Votes for proposals should be done using the vote tags and include "Yea" or "Nay" and include the proposal number. Voting can also be done by using heal and hurt tags around the proposal number, where a 'heal' vote indicates a "Yea" vote and a "hurt" tag indicates a 'Nay' vote. A player can also abstain from voting; their vote will not be counted among the number of active votes.

R206-A0

Votes for proposals should be done using the vote tags and include "Yea" or "Nay" and include the proposal number. A player can also abstain from voting; their vote will not be counted among the number of active votes.

R206-A1 (P002)

R206 shall be amended to the following: Votes for proposals should be done using the vote tags and include "Yea" or "Nay" and include the proposal number. Voting can also be done by using heal and hurt tags around the proposal number, where a 'heal' vote indicates a "Yea" vote and a "hurt" tag indicates a 'Nay' vote. A player can also abstain from voting; their vote will not be counted among the number of active votes.

R207: Maintaining the Wiki

A current list of all rules, players, proposals, and other important information shall be maintained by all players on the wiki page. The list can be updated by any player, active or inactive. The moderator should set a precedent for the format that all other players shall follow. If a player is unsure of how something should be formatted, they should ask in the Nomic thread. Should any player edit the wiki page not in accordance with the rules of the game, the edit shall be rolled back.

R301: Reputation (P001)

A currency shall be established called Reputation. When a proposal is passed, the creator of said proposal shall gain a number of Reputation equal to the number of votes for said proposal. Additionally, all players who voted for said proposal shall gain 1 Reputation. This applies retroactively.

R302: Self-Voting (P003)

Someone is assumed to already be voting for their own proposal unless otherwise stated.

R303: Amendments to Proposals (P005)

Any proposal currently under discussion can be altered by the player who proposed it, so long as the major focus of the proposal is not altered. When the player does such, all votes for the proposal except for that of the player who proposed it are removed.

R304: Calls for Judgement (P006)

If players disagree about the legality of a rule or the interpretation of a rule, a player can request a Call for Judgement, beginning with CfJ001. Any player may propose a verdict for the disagreement, beginning with CfJ001-V1. Players use vote tags to support a verdict, in the form VOTE: CfJ001-V1. Players who propose a verdict assumed to be voting for their own verdict until they vote otherwise.

Once a verdict reaches a majority of active player's votes, it is determined as the official ruling on the Call for Judgement. If all players are voting for a verdict, the verdict with the most votes wins. If there is a tie, the verdict proposed by the player with more reputation wins. If there is still a tie, the CfJ is not resolved until the circumstances change.

R305: Rule Titles (P009)

Rules shall have titles; any proposal suggesting a rule must also suggest a title for said rule. Existing rules can be given titles or have their titles altered by titling proposals, beginning with T001. Each proposal or rule must be given a unique title, where a 'unique title' is defined as 'a title that does not share a title with any existing rule or active proposal'.

R305-A0 (P009)

Rules shall have titles; any proposal suggesting a rule must also suggest a title for said rule. Existing rules can be given titles or have their titles altered by titling proposals, beginning with T001.

R305-A1 (P026)

This proposal repeals P307 and amends P305 to read as follows:

Rules shall have titles; any proposal suggesting a rule must also suggest a title for said rule. Existing rules can be given titles or have their titles altered by titling proposals, beginning with T001. Each proposal or rule must be given a unique title, where a 'unique title' is defined as 'a title that does not share a title with any existing rule or active proposal'.

R306: Hit Points

Every player has a property called "Hit Points." Each player starts with 10 Hit Points. A player may spend 20 reputation to cause another player to lose 1 hit point. A player may spend 25 reputation to cause another player to gain 1 hit point.

R306-A0 (P010)

Every player has a property called "Hit Points." Each player starts with 10 Hit Points.

R306-A1 (P017)

Amend R306 by appending: A player may spend 20 reputation to cause another player to lose 1 hit point.

R306-A2 (P018)

Amend R306 by appending: A player may spend 25 reputation to cause another player to gain 1 hit point.

R308: Proposal Withdrawals (P015)

A person may withdraw their own proposal if the voting period is still active.

R309: Rate-Limiting Proposals (P020)

A player may not make more than 5 proposals within the span of 60 minutes. However, withdrawing a proposal causes it to no longer count towards this limit.

R310: Rule Violations (P021)

Any player found guilty of breaking the rules by verdict of a CfJ shall be penalized 2 Reputation for every broken mutable rule and 5 Reputation for every broken immutable rule.

R311: Call for Judgement Abbreviation (P023)

In the rules, CfJ stands for Call for Judgement unless otherwise stated.

R312: Events/Effects (P025)

A player may use a proposal to create a one-time effect (or event, these terms are synonymous). The numbering system is E001, E002, etc. They will pass with majority approval; however, the proposal may give itself a stricter condition (not a weaker condition!) for passing instead.

R313: Hit Points Abbreviation (P028)

"HP" is an official abbreviation for "Hit Point(s)".

Players

Allomancer

Joined 28 Dec 2018
Currently Active

Reputation: 21
Hit Points: 10

Charles510

Joined 28 Dec 2018
Currently Active

Reputation: 11
Hit Points: 10

skitter30

Joined 28 Dec 2018
Currently Active

Reputation: 18
Hit Points: 10

Invisibility

Joined 28 Dec 2018
Currently Inactive

Reputation: 9
Hit Points: 10

2 718281828459

Joined 31 Dec 2018
Currently Active

Reputation: 1
Hit Points: 10

Calls for Judgement

CfJ001

There is no provision in the rules for one-time effects. Thus, this CfJ is established to determine the legality of P019.

CfJ001-V1

Proposed by Invisibility

One-time events should be in their own section on the wiki page and be numbered E01 and so on. They are still voted on as proposals.

Votes: 2 718281828459

CfJ001-V2

Proposed by Allomancer

As there is no provision in the rules for one-time events, P019 shall be declared null and void. The rationale for this verdict over V1 is that Calls for Judgement should aim to be as unintrusive to the game as possible and are intended to determine the interpretation of the rules. V1 aims to establish a new rule, rather than interpret existing rules.

Votes:

CfJ001-V3

Proposed by Charles510

As there is no provision in the rules for one-time events, P019 should be interpreted as a new rule proposal.

Votes:

Verdict: CfJ001-V4

Proposed by Allomancer

As P019 has since been withdrawn, this Call for Judgement shall be resolved with no further action.

Votes: Allomancer, Charles510, Invisibility

Events

E001 (P027)

One time event: When this event passes, all players who voted for it may choose to either gain 50 reputation or 3 Hit Points.

Current Proposals

P031

Proposed by Allomancer

This proposal repeals R311 and amends its text to R304. It also repeals R313 and appends its text to R306.

Yea: Allomancer, skitter30
Nay:
Abstain:

P032: Shop

Proposed by skitter30

Upon the passing of this proposition, an empty shop is established. New items may only be added to the shop via new propositions. Every player receives five Reputation upon the passing of this proposal. People may buy items from the shop by posting "buy <item>" in the thread. 

Yea: skitter30, Allomancer
Nay:
Abstain:

P033: Reputation Tracker

Proposed by Allomancer

The official reputation tracker for the game shall be found at keepthescore.co/game/xmgrpgpqkqe. All occurrences which cause someone to gain or lose reputation shall be recorded in it. It counts as within the realm of the rules as per R101.

Yea: Allomancer
Nay:
Abstain:

Failed Proposals

P004

Proposed by Allomancer

If a proposal has been under debate for a week without reaching a quorum of yeas or nays, it shall be passed or refused based on whether it has more yeas or nays.

Yea: Allomancer
Nay: Invisibility, Charles510
Abstain:

P007

Proposed by 2 718281828459

If your reputation is greater than or equal to (256 + Player X's reputation), you may assassinate player X, removing them from the game. They can re-join as a new player in 68 hours.

Yea: 2 718281828459
Nay: Invisibility, Allomancer, Charles510
Abstain:

P008

Proposed by 2 718281828459

A player may choose to spend reputation in the market. No one may "reserve" or "pre-order" shares. The price for the first share is 1 reputation, the next is 2, then 3, etc. Of course, we are all buying from the same supply, and so the price for the next share is equal to (# of shares currently owned by all players + 1). You can also sell a share. The sell-back price is equal to the number of current investors. The cooldown between any two market actions is 20 hours.

Yea: 2 718281828459
Nay: Invisibility, Allomancer, Charles510
Abstain:

P014: Spirit of the Rules

Proposed by Allomancer

The spirit of the rules should always take precedence over technical loopholes.

Yea: Allomancer
Nay: Charles510, Skitter30, Invisibility
Abstain:

P011: Wiki Maintenance

Proposed by skitter30

The person who makes a proposal is responsible for all wiki edits associated with that proposal.

Yea: skitter30
Nay: Allomancer, Charles510, 2 718281828459
Abstain:

P013: Judicial Precedent

Proposed by Allomancer

The verdicts of CfJs should always remain consistent with prior CfJs and establish similar verdicts for similar situations, barring a rule change having altered the situation.

Yea: Allomancer, Invisibility
Nay: Charles510, 2 718281828459
Abstain: Skitter30

P016

Proposed by 2 718281828459

Amend R306 by appending: If a player ever has 0 or negative hit points they are eliminated.

Yea: 2 718281828459
Nay: Invisibility, Allomancer, Charles510
Abstain:

P031

Proposed by 2 718281828459

Amend rule R304 to state the following:
If players disagree about the legality of a rule or the interpretation of a rule, a player can request a Call for Judgement, beginning with CfJ001. Any player may propose a verdict for the disagreement, beginning with CfJ001-V1. Players use vote tags to support a verdict, in the form VOTE: CfJ001-V1. A player may vote for multiple different verdicts. No player may vote for the same verdict multiple times. Players who propose a verdict assumed to be voting for their own verdict until they vote otherwise.
Once a verdict reaches a majority of active player's votes, it is determined as the official ruling on the Call for Judgement, unless two or more verdicts have a majority and not all players are voting yet. If all players are voting for a verdict, the verdict with the most votes wins. If there is a tie, the verdict proposed by the player with more reputation wins. If there is still a tie, the CfJ is not resolved until the circumstances change.

Yea: 2 718281828459
Nay: Allomancer, Invisibility, Charles510
Abstain:

P024: Elimination

Proposed by 2 718281828459

When a player is reduced to 0 Hit Points, they lose all their resources, items, etc and are not counted as a player. In 44 hours, they can re-join as though they are a new player. This rule shall be inoperative if the Hit Points property is discontinued.

Yea: 2 718281828459, Charles510
Nay: Invisibility, Allomancer
Abstain: skitter30

Passed Proposals

P001 (R301)

Proposed by Allomancer

A currency shall be established called Reputation. When a proposal is passed, the creator of said proposal shall gain a number of Reputation equal to the number of votes for said proposal. Additionally, all players who voted for said proposal shall gain 1 Reputation. This applies retroactively. 

Yea: Allomancer, skitter30, Charles510
Nay:
Abstain:

P002 (R206-A1)

Proposed by skitter30

R206 shall be amended to the following:
Votes for proposals should be done using the vote tags and include "Yea" or "Nay" and include the proposal number. Voting can also be done by using heal and hurt tags around the proposal number, where a 'heal' vote indicates a "Yea" vote and a "hurt" tag indicates a 'Nay' vote. A player can also abstain from voting; their vote will not be counted among the number of active votes.

Yea: skitter30, Charles510
Nay:
Abstain: Allomancer, Invisibility

P003 (R302)

Proposed by Invisibility

Someone is assumed to already be voting for their own proposal unless otherwise stated.

Yea: Invisibility, Charles510, skitter30, Allomancer
Nay:
Abstain:

P005 (R303)

Proposed by Allomancer

Any proposal currently under discussion can be altered by the player who proposed it, so long as the major focus of the proposal is not altered. When the player does such, all votes for the proposal except for that of the player who proposed it are removed.

Yea: Allomancer, Invisibility, Charles510
Nay:
Abstain:

P006 (R304)

Proposed by Allomancer

If players disagree about the legality of a rule or the interpretation of a rule, a player can request a Call for Judgement, beginning with CfJ001. Any player may propose a verdict for the disagreement, beginning with CfJ001-V1. Players use vote tags to support a verdict, in the form VOTE: CfJ001-V1. Players who propose a verdict assumed to be voting for their own verdict until they vote otherwise. 
 Once a verdict reaches a majority of active player's votes, it is determined as the official ruling on the Call for Judgement. If all players are voting for a verdict, the verdict with the most votes wins. If there is a tie, the verdict proposed by the player with more reputation wins. If there is still a tie, the CfJ is not resolved until the circumstances change.

Yea: Allomancer, Invisibility, Charles510
Nay:
Abstain:

P009 (R305)

Proposed by Allomancer

Rules shall have titles; any proposal suggesting a rule must also suggest a title for said rule. Existing rules can be given titles or have their titles altered by titling proposals, beginning with T001.

Yea: Allomancer, Charles510, Invisibility
Nay:
Abstain:

P010 (R306)

Proposed by Charles510

Every player has a property called "Hit Points" Each player starts with 10 Hit Points.

Yea: Charles510, Allomancer, skitter30
Nay:
Abstain: Invisibility

P012 (R307)

Proposed by skitter30

Each proposal or rule must be given a unique title

Yea: skitter30, Allomancer, Charles510
Nay: Invisibility
Abstain:

T001

Proposed by skitter30

Changed titles as follows: 
R201 - Minimum Number of Active Players
R202 - Naming System 
R203 - Definition of Amendment
R204 - Minimum Number of Votes for Mutable Rules 
R205 - Resolution of Rule Conflicts 
R206 - Acceptable Voting Methods
R207 - Maintaining the Wiki
R301 - Reputation
R302 - Self-Voting 
R303 - Amendments to Proposals
R304 - Calls for Judgement

Yea: skitter30, Invisibility, Allomancer
Nay:
Abstain:

P015 (R308)

Proposed by skitter30

A person may withdraw their own proposal if the voting period is still active.

Yea: skitter30, Allomancer, 2 718281828459
Nay:
Abstain:

P017

Proposed by 2 718281828459

Amend R306 by appending: A player may spend 20 reputation to cause another player to lose 1 hit point.

Yea: 2 718281828459, Invisibility, Allomancer
Nay:
Abstain:

P018

Proposed by 2 718281828459

Amend R306 by appending: A player may spend 25 reputation to cause another player to gain 1 hit point.

Yea: 2 718281828459, Invisibility, Allomancer
Nay:
Abstain:

T002

Proposed by Allomancer

R101: Authority of Rules
R102: Players
R103: Ability to Change Rules
R104: Editing and Deleting Posts
R105: Dominance of Immutable Rules
R106: Player Votes
R107: Transmutation of Immutable Rules
R108: Transmutation of Mutable Rules
R109: Voting Threshold Definitions
R110: New Rules

Yea: Allomancer, 2 718281828459, Invisibility
Nay:
Abstain:

P020 (R309)

Proposed by 2 718281828459

A player may not make more than 5 proposals within the span of 60 minutes. However, withdrawing a proposal causes it to no longer count towards this limit.

Yea: 2 718281828459, Allomancer, Charles510
Nay:
Abstain:

P021 (R310)

Proposed by Allomancer

Any player found guilty of breaking the rules by verdict of a CfJ shall be penalized 2 Reputation for every broken mutable rule and 5 Reputation for every broken immutable rule.

Yea: Allomancer, Invisibility, Charles510
Nay:
Abstain:

P023 (R311)

Proposed by Invisibility

In the rules, CfJ stands for Call for Judgement unless otherwise stated.

Yea: Invisibility, Allomancer, 2 718281828459
Nay:
Abstain:

P025 (R312)

Proposed by 2 718281828459

A player may use a proposal to create a one-time effect (or event, these terms are synonymous). The numbering system is E001, E002, etc. They will pass with majority approval; however, the proposal may give itself a stricter condition (not a weaker condition!) for passing instead.

Yea: 2 718281828459, skitter30, Charles510
Nay:
Abstain:

P026

Proposed by skitter30

This proposal repeals P307 and amends P305 to read as follows:
Rules shall have titles; any proposal suggesting a rule must also suggest a title for said rule. Existing rules can be given titles or have their titles altered by titling proposals, beginning with T001. Each proposal or rule must be given a unique title, where a 'unique title' is defined as 'a title that does not share a title with any existing rule or active proposal'.

Yea: skitter30, Invisibility, Charles510
Nay:
Abstain:

P028 (R313)

Proposed by 2 718281828459

"HP" is an official abbreviation for "Hit Point(s)".

Yea: 2 718281828459, Charles510, Allomancer
Nay:
Abstain:

P027 (E001)

Proposed by 2 718281828459

One time event: When this event passes, all players who voted for it may choose to either gain 50 reputation or 3 Hit Points.

Yea: 2 718281828459, Charles510, skitter30
Nay: Invisibility, Allomancer
Abstain:

P030

Proposed by 2 718281828459
Requires unanimous consent

Transmute rule 110 from immutable to mutable

Yea: 2 718281828459, Charles510, Allomancer
Nay:
Abstain: Invisibility, skitter30

P029 (R314)

Proposed by 2 718281828459

You may gain +1 hit point if you have not done so in the previous 68 hours.

Yea: 2 718281828459, Charles510
Nay: Allomancer
Abstain: skitter30

Withdrawn Proposals

P019

Proposed by 2 718281828459

If and when this proposal is voted in, all players who voted for it, and never voted against it at any point in time, will receive 50 reputation, and the usual bonuses will NOT apply.

Yea: 2 718281828459
Nay:
Abstain: Allomancer

P022

Proposed by Invisibility

Amend 302 to "Someone is assumed to already be voting for their own proposal or CfJ verdict unless otherwise stated.

Yea: Invisibility
Nay:
Abstain:

Repealed Rules

R307: Title Uniqueness (P012) | Repealed by P026

Each proposal or rule must be given a unique title