You are viewing the MafiaScum.net Wiki. To play the game, visit the forum.
Talk:Lover: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Dani Banani (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
(→Pictures haven't aged well?: new section) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:no, they shouldn't be deleted, b/c in the future we may expand those pages to have their own page, rather than just a redirect... in these 'illogical' cases, it's normally better to leave pages active rather than deleting them... that's my opinion, anyway...<br><sup> – {{user|Dani Banani}} {{#ifeq:t|t|20:01, 12.11.2007 (UTC)|t}}</sup> | :no, they shouldn't be deleted, b/c in the future we may expand those pages to have their own page, rather than just a redirect... in these 'illogical' cases, it's normally better to leave pages active rather than deleting them... that's my opinion, anyway...<br><sup> – {{user|Dani Banani}} {{#ifeq:t|t|20:01, 12.11.2007 (UTC)|t}}</sup> | ||
== Pictures haven't aged well? == | |||
Just saying, it's 2020 and the pictures here are kinda questionable. | |||
Latest revision as of 06:19, 11 June 2020
The links Lover, Lovers and Treacherous Lover all redirect to this same page. Should they be deleted? (sorry to ask, but I don't know what to to in these illogical cases) Andycyca||me||What? 00:12, 11 December 2007 (MST)
- no, they shouldn't be deleted, b/c in the future we may expand those pages to have their own page, rather than just a redirect... in these 'illogical' cases, it's normally better to leave pages active rather than deleting them... that's my opinion, anyway...
– Dani Banani (talk • contribs) 20:01, 12.11.2007 (UTC)
Pictures haven't aged well?
Just saying, it's 2020 and the pictures here are kinda questionable.